05 November 2008

Returns

Times Square, Election Night 2008

Though I don’t know whether my paper ballot will count, I did manage to vote yesterday, and I am glad of it. This would have been a lousy moment in history to miss out on — and it strikes me now as foolish that, as I originally planned my autumn, I intended to be in Paris on Election Day. True, the Place de Clichy may have been filled with revelry and honking cars upon the announcement of Obama’s victory, and it might have been interesting to see that. But I needed to be in New York last night. We have been through so much together, my city and I. I am glad we shared this, too.

My chief political adviser, Feldstein, and I met for drinks in a Ninth Avenue bar that — much to our surprise — had no television. This would not do. We repaired to a nearby Mexican restaurant, where I knew for a fact that two television sets hanging over the bar would be playing CNN, sound off but captions running.

We found it difficult to tolerate the suspense, as the network refused to call individual contests, and seemingly sure states hung in the balance. We weren’t appeased by the knowledge that the results must surely be known already to people who work in the newsroom. When I worked at CBS, Feldstein recalled, I phoned him at 3 in the afternoon on Election Day ’96 to tell him that Clinton had won reelection; denied the privileges of knowledge and access now, we grew nervous and bitter. We drank quite a number of Mexican beers, and we were rewarded for our patronage with tequila shots, on the house. Whatever Mr. Obama does to NAFTA, Feldstein and I have done our part to shore up the Mexican economy.

To kill time, CNN played with technological toys, the most notable of which was also the most ethically indefensible: the use of a hologram to make it appear that a reporter was in the newsroom, when in fact she was in the field. Apparently the folks at CNN are unaware that it is not the function of a news organization to make viewers believe that anybody, reporter or reportee, is in a place where she is not. Honestly! Do we really wonder that journalists have so little credibility anymore?

In CNN Headquarters, Wolf Blitzer interviews reporter Jessica Yellin.

My professional dander was up, and I bellowed at the television until my adviser thoughtfully advised me to shut up.

The restaurant manager let us listen to the program as the evening wore down, and we heard the historic news of Obama’s triumph and the grace of McCain’s concession — before we were tossed into the gutter.

CNN had been showing us pictures of the crowds in Times Square, just a few blocks away, and so, as Feldstein returned to his apartment, I made my way through the Square. Thousands of my neighbors were out, chattering and laughing, cheering and crying. The hour was too sweet to pass in solitude. I thought — inevitably — of 9/11, and the silence of Broadway as I walked that day. Last night, Broadway was another street entirely, perhaps another universe. We were happy. We were hopeful. We were Americans, and united. And for now we have reason to hope that something better lies before us.



Read more!

04 November 2008

Election Day

The question du jour is whether I will be able to vote in my native country’s Presidential election.

When I requested my absentee ballot, I expected to be in France on Election Day. As it happens, I’ve extended my stay in the United States. No one is quite sure where my absentee ballot is, since the post office in Beynes insists I’ve had no mail at all in the past month. (This raises all kinds of interesting philosophical questions. If an American Express bill falls in the forest, and no one delivers it, do I still have to pay it?) Because I requested that absentee ballot, I may be disqualified now from voting at home. Or I may not. I am, after all, registered in Harlem. Thus we are talking about the rules and practices of the Board of Elections of New York State, and our particular state is, G*d bless it, deservedly not famous for bureaucratic efficiency in any department.

Sometime today, I will make my way to the polling place where I last voted, in 2004, to beg for the right to cast a vote for President. This is exciting. Middle-aged white guys from Very Old Southern Families don’t ordinarily have trouble voting. We are more likely to make trouble for others. Will I be discriminated against? I’m almost giddy with the prospect.

There’s little chance that my vote will affect the outcome of the election, one way or another. My neighbors in Harlem are likely to agree with me, and New York’s electoral votes are likely to go to Senator Obama. Which is as it should be.

I spent a long time belaboring a little article for this space, on the subject of endorsements and bias in the press — and after several attempts, I abandoned it. I feel strongly about the subject, but this isn’t a political blog. And while it’s clear to frequent visitors to this space that I find little to admire in the Bush Administration, it’s also clear to me that my political analysis is of limited interest to anyone, even to myself.

When I came to France, at the height of “Freedom Fries”, I often detected a slight hesitation among the French I met, a tensing of the muscles. Yet invariably the French relaxed as the thought visibly crossed their minds: if Bill Madison is in France, he must not be one of those ardently pro-Bush Americans. My readers probably have made the same observation, one way or another, and thus it’s no secret that I don’t support the Presidential candidate who sided with Bush 90 percent of the time and who promises only minor and cosmetic changes in Bush’s policies. (Is it biased to say so? Or am I announcing the results of a fair and balanced assessment? Go figure.)

I’m supporting Obama. He’s smart, he’s tough, and he’s serious. I don’t harbor illusions that he’ll make of this nation a New Eden. No one could resolve entirely the problems before us, but I do believe Barack Obama will seek real remedies to our manifold crises. He is our best hope. If he wins, I will celebrate not just change but renewal for my country.


...And if he loses — I will seek French citizenship.


Read more!

03 November 2008

Seeing Red (Leaves)

As I mentioned yesterday, the autumn foliage along the Hudson this year is quite spectacular, but shades of red are hard to find among the gold and green. This scarcity does have the advantage of making red leaves seem more precious, and as these photos indicate, even on an overcast day, the color is eye-catching and memorable, and well worth seeking out.

Don’t you wish you were here?



Read more!

02 November 2008

Hudson River School

The Hastings water tower keeps watch on the New Jersey Palisades

Autumn has come, and with it I have come to Westchester, where I pretend to be a commuter, taking the train into the City to work, and where I am spending more time with my goddaughter. (Please, try to control yourselves — envy is such an unattractive characteristic, don’t you think?)

I’m told that the foliage at the moment isn’t quite what it could be. People say we are lacking a particularly cold night that would have popped the colors to more vibrant life; it’s true I’ve seen very few really good reds, apart from a solitary maple in the parking lot of the A&P. But the yellows are tremendous, and as I walk I admire great nimbi of lemon and daffodil that shudder nervously, out of place among the piney green.


On several morning walks this week, I have forgotten to bring a camera, and on another morning, I brought it only to discover that the batteries were dead. Yesterday morning, I took lots of pictures, though the light was by far the least interesting I’d seen all week, the sky hazy and not azure but merely blue. It is just as well that I’m such a terrible photographer.

Growing up in Dallas, I had only vague notions of autumn: it’s a season that, in North Texas, takes place in late November or early December, between 3 and 4 A.M., when every deciduous leaf simultaneously turns brown and drops to the ground: you wake up, and it’s over. Fall foliage was otherwise something I knew only from pictures in books. I’m not the only transplant who feels this way: during her brief stint in Westchester, Karen Reidy used to collect leaves and to experiment with different potions and unguents with which to preserve the colors. My attempts in this regard resulted in some rather greasy scrapbooks that smelled of rancid cashews and attracted vermin.

And so when I see the morning light against the russet tapestries of the New Jersey Palisades, I must take pictures of my own; I must find some way to record what I see. If I had only black-and-white images, I might not bother; if I had no blog, you wouldn’t be subjected to the gracelessness of my efforts.


Read more!

22 October 2008

Who’s Afraid of Andy Weems?

Make it a double: Andrew Weems and Deborah Hedwall

I realized belatedly that by writing about Andrew Weems after his play Namaste Man had closed, I may have denied some readers who live in the vicinity of Seattle’s Intiman Theater the opportunity to see the show for themselves. I didn’t mean to cheat you: the fact that I couldn’t get to Seattle was so cruel and all-consuming to me that I ignored what was possible for others.

Now Andy is playing George in Who’s Afraid of Virginia Woolf? at Baltimore’s Centerstage, 22 October–30 November. Although Andy didn’t write the play, it is a very good one, and I have been yearning to see him in the role pretty much since the day we met. I have often said I would kill for the chance to see him play George, and now the chance is upon me. Need I therefore commit murder? It seems a comparatively easy (and morally upright) task merely to take the train to Baltimore, especially since I am already in the U.S. at the moment.

After all, part of the fun of knowing performers is actually getting to see them at work. One can watch a chartered accountant at work, too, but it is much less fun, both for you and for the accountant. For your friends who are actors or singers, getting watched comes with the territory. Moreover, those moments are awkward when you try to explain to your friend why you didn’t see her latest show, which is why I just ordered a ticket to hear Susan Graham at the Metropolitan Opera. I need to hear her sing Berlioz’ La Damnation de Faust.

I can write it off my taxes. As a medical expense. (Faust is a doctor, after all.)

Famed Andrew Weems Celebrity Impersonator Rick Burtone (left),
with costar Shirley Himmelfarber,
in a scene from his touring Weems Tribute Revue


If you’re planning to be in the Baltimore area, why not join me for Virginia Woolf on November 2? We’ll make a theater party of it!


Read more!

Field Guide: Enfants Sauvages

Wild Child: Testud in Aime ton père

Though the French film industry is remarkable in offering leading roles to actresses past the age of 40 and 50, there are plenty of younger women onscreen, too, and two of these — Sylvie Testud and Ludivine Sagnier — promise to become durable stars.

That said, Sylvie Testud might go into politics or marine biology. She’s completely unpredictable. Already branching out beyond cinema, Testud played real-life novelists Amélie Nothomb in Stupeur et tremblements (Fear and Trembling) and Françoise Sagan in the recent Sagan: now she’s a published author in her own right. I’ve yet to read her work, though from a quick glance it appears to be closer to Nothomb’s work than to Jackie Collins’: it may be beach reading, but it’s not celebrity trash. A fierce yet feline presence onscreen, this Lyon native exudes restless intelligence, raw sexuality, and not a little rebelliousness; these qualities served her well in two early roles, Albertine in Chantal Akerman’s updating of Proust, La Captive, and one of the sisters who inspired Genet’s The Maids in Les Blessures assassines. She is always exciting to watch, always strange and surprising. Look for her as Edith Piaf’s sidekick in La Môme (La Vie en Rose) — and anywhere else you can find her.

Testud in Stupeur et tremblements

Another of my favorites, Ludivine Sagnier has proven herself phenomenally versatile already, excelling in comedy (8 Femmes), drama (Swimming Pool), mystery (A Girl Cut in Two), and a musical (Les Chansons d’amour). She even played Tinkerbell in the 2003 Peter Pan! Though she’s generally playing a sex kitten, she’s wily, and she bends her art to suit the material. To my surprise, she popped up in Claude Miller’s A Secret (2007, currently playing in New York, where I saw it this week); here, she plays not the sex kitten but a young Jewish woman under the Nazi Occupation, whose doubts about her marriage have disastrous consequences for her child. When you go to see her pictures, you honestly don’t know what to expect. Her precocious track record comes as a relief, because even in cinemaniac France, we get flash-in-the-pans, one-note wonders, dropouts and flameouts. There’s every reason to think that Sagnier will be around for a long time.

Sagnier, as one-third of a couple in Les Chansons d’amour


Read more!

21 October 2008

Field Guide: Sandrine Bonnaire

Hitchcock blonde? Bonnaire, in Confidences trop intimes

Another very beautiful actress, Sandrine Bonnaire got an early start (the lead in Agnès Varda’s Vagabond), Bonnaire may be following the example of Simone Signoret and Jeanne Moreau by aging fearlessly. She’s still slim and barely 40, but look — she’s got crow’s feet! And darn it, she still looks great. What’s more, the openness and brilliance of her smile serve her in a variety of roles: her characters often begin with goodwill toward all — until somebody pushes them too far.

With Marina Foïs, in Un coeur simple

Highly intelligent offscreen, Bonnaire plays naïve beautifully: her gradual revelations of toughness or savvy lend extra interest, even mystery, to her films. She made banality terrifying in Claude Chabrol’s La Cérémonie, opposite the more overt Isabelle Huppert; she struck plausibly Hitchockian notes in Patrice Lecomte’s Confidences trop intimes (Intimate Strangers), in which nothing turns out as expected. Recently, she starred as one of Flaubert’s most curious creations, the simpleminded housemaid Félicité in Un coeur simple, and she directed a well-received documentary, Elle s'appelle Sabine, about her sister, treated (not always gently) for what was diagnosed as autism. She seems remarkably well-poised to benefit from French cinema’s liberality toward leading ladies: plenty of important pictures are made here starring women over 30, and opportunities exist for actresses to bring their talents to other fields, such as screenwriting and direction.

With my beloved Catherine Frot in L’empreinte de l’ange,
An autumn 2008 release I haven’t seen!



Read more!